Each team also prepared a report on what special issues its government is facing, and how policymakers are attempting to shape the region’s changing spatial form. To make the data comparable across national boundaries, they mapped the physical evolution of the 12 city regions in 1960, 1970, 19, and then linked these maps to changes in key economic and social indicators over the same period. Prior to the conference, research teams in each of the city regions gathered data to chart the growth and movement of their populations, infrastructure changes, and economic and industrial development over the last three decades. What social and economic problems do urban residents face today? How are their local and national governments attempting to manage these problems? ![]() Third, the researchers explored changes in the quality of urban life resulting from the dynamics of globalization. How have populations dispersed around new transportation networks and economic centers? How can regional planning efforts influence changes in spatial form and impacts on the environment? For example, how have the loss of traditional agricultural or industrial economies and the introduction of new players with investment capital changed the ways cities work? How have cities attempted to position themselves in relation to these powerful external forces?Īnother research goal was to understand the relationships between changing urban form and regional infrastructure investments, such as transportation systems and new technology centers. First, they examined the effects of the global political economy on the growth and development of cities over time. Using the 12 sites as case studies, the researchers outlined several levels of investigation to assemble a picture of what global city regions look like and why.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |